Statistics on International Development 2006
Section 5
Contents
| Section 1 |
Section 2 |
Section 3 |
Section 4 | Section 5
| Table Index
The Heavily
Indebted Poor Countries Initiative (HIPC) |
Implementation Status of Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) as of end August
2006 |
DFID Bilateral Aid Debts |
UK Bilateral Aid Debts |
Multilateral Debt Relief |
HIPC Debt Management Capacity Building
Programme (CBP) |
Reporting of Debt Relief
Debt Relief
Introduction
1. Debt is a major development issue. There is widespread
support for lifting the burden of unpayable debt from the poorest countries.
Debt relief frees developing countries from their debt service payments. They
can then use these savings to implement a national poverty reduction strategy.
2. The UK provides debt relief, where appropriate, on debts owed to DFID, CDC
and ECGD1 , as well as advice and technical assistance to strengthen countries’
management of their debts. The UK also makes additional contributions to
international financial institutions such as the World Bank, African Development
Bank (AfDB) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to compensate them for the
costs of debt relief. Contributions to the IMF in 2005/2006, and to the World
Bank and AfDB from 2006/2007, are or will be reported with other contributions
to these bodies as multilateral aid.
3. A country’s debt can be described in terms of ‘principal’
and ‘interest’. The principal is the amount of the original loan still
outstanding. A country’s debt stock is the outstanding principal, plus any
interest accrued (as well as any penalties incurred for failure to make debt
service payments).
4. Debt Relief can take various forms, including:
- Debt cancellation
(sometimes called stock relief) - partial or 100 per cent reduction of amounts
outstanding (principal and/or interest);
- Debt rescheduling where payments
(interest and/or principal) are delayed or rearranged;
- Flow relief – partial
or 100 per cent relief on debt service payments.
5. Decisions to award a particular type of debt relief, for example, under
the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative, are usually made by
international consensus. All creditors participating in the HIPC Initiative are
then expected to deliver agreed (or better) terms. Bilateral deals can also take
place between creditors and debtor governments. The Paris Club is the main forum
for agreeing treatment of bilateral (government to government) debt.
6. The Paris Club is an informal group of government creditors
who work together to find co-ordinated and sustainable solutions to payment
difficulties experienced by debtor nations. The UK is a permanent member of the
Paris Club.
7. To date, the Paris Club, or ad hoc groups of Paris Club creditors, have
reached 403 agreements concerning 84 debtor countries. Debt treatments in the
Paris Club can take various forms. Details of the options and terms available
are given in the Glossary.
1. See Glossary for a description of CDC and ECGD.
8. The HIPC Initiative
was launched by the World Bank and the IMF in 1996 to reduce the debts of the
poorest and most indebted countries to sustainable levels. The majority of
bilateral (government) and multilateral creditors (such as the World Bank, IMF
and Regional Development Banks) have agreed to participate.
9. The HIPC Initiative was strengthened in 1999 and re-launched as the
enhanced HIPC Initiative (e-HIPC). In particular, the link between debt relief
and poverty reduction was strengthened under e-HIPC. To be eligible, countries
must demonstrate their commitment to sound economic management (and the
implementation of an IMF programme) and poverty reduction through the
implementation of a national Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper, PRSP. A PRSP
analyses poverty in the country and sets out what government will do to reduce
it. The strategy also contains expenditure frameworks which indicate how
resources, including savings from debt relief, will be allocated.
10. Debt relief under HIPC is delivered in two stages. Initially countries
work towards ‘Decision Point’ by developing an interim PRSP, and establishing a
track record of sound economic management, generally under an IMF Poverty
Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF) funded programme. When these standards have
been met, interim debt relief is delivered, meaning that debt service payments
are considerably reduced. Countries then work towards ‘Completion Point’ and
irrevocable debt stock cancellation by developing a full PRSP and implementing
it for a year. They must also continue their sound economic management under an
IMF programme, as well as implementing any agreed structural reforms. ‘Decision
Point’ and ‘Completion Point’ status is decided by the Executive Boards of the IMF and World Bank and subsequently by the Board of the relevant Regional
Development Bank. The Paris Club group then follows this lead.
11. Overall, debt relief worth over $70 billion has been agreed under HIPC
for 29 countries so far. This has reduced their debts, on average, by around
two-thirds, and freed up roughly $1 billion a year for spending on poverty
reduction. Several of these countries did not meet the full set of normal HIPC
requirements, but the international community agreed to be more flexible in
assessing eligibility for relief, including, for example, post conflict
countries.
12. The table on the following page shows the progress of eligible countries
through the HIPC Initiative. Twenty countries (16 of them African) have now
completed the HIPC Initiative and received irrevocable debt relief. Nine more
African countries are receiving interim relief. A further 14 countries are
eligible for HIPC but have yet to progress through the Initiative. Some have
struggled with governance problems or conflict, whilst 6 have only recently
become eligible under the extended ‘HIPC Sunset Clause’ (end date by which
countries can qualify for starting the Initiative). Of these 14 countries,
Sri Lanka, Bhutan and Lao PDR have indicated that they do not wish to
participate.
Countries at Completion Point (irrevocable relief) |
Decision Point Date |
Completion Point Date |
Benin |
July 2000 |
April 2003 |
Bolivia |
Feb 2000 |
June 2001 |
Burkina Faso |
July 2000 |
April 2002 |
Cameroon |
Oct 2000 |
May 2006 |
Ethiopia |
Nov 2000 |
April 2004 |
Ghana |
Feb 2000 |
July 2004 |
Guyana |
Nov 2000 |
Dec 2003 |
Honduras |
July 2000 |
April 2005 |
Mali |
Sept 2000 |
Feb 2003 |
Mauritania |
Feb 2000 |
June 2002 |
Madagascar |
Dec 2000 |
Oct 2004 |
Malawi |
Dec 2000 |
August 2006 |
Mozambique |
April 2000 |
Sept 2001 |
Nicaragua |
Dec 2000 |
Jan 2004 |
Niger |
Dec 2000 |
April 2004 |
Rwanda |
Dec 2000 |
April 2005 |
Senegal |
June 2000 |
April 2004 |
Tanzania |
April 2000 |
Nov 2001 |
Uganda |
Feb 2000 |
May 2000 |
Zambia |
Dec 2000 |
April 2005 |
Countries at Decision Point (interm relief) |
Burundi |
August 2005 |
|
Chad |
May 2001 |
|
DR Congo |
July 2003 |
|
Gambia |
Dec 2000 |
|
Guinea |
Dec 2000 |
|
Guinea-Bissau |
Dec 2000 |
|
Republic of Congo |
March 2006 |
|
Sao Tome and Principe |
Dec 2000 |
|
Sierra Leone |
March 2002 |
|
Pre-Decision Point Countries |
Central African Republic |
|
|
Comoros |
|
|
Cote D'Ivoire |
|
|
Eritrea |
|
|
Kyrgyz Republic |
|
|
Liberia |
|
|
Nepal |
|
|
Somalia |
|
|
Sudan |
|
|
Togo |
|
|
In addition, three countries have opted not to
participate in HIPC at this stage: |
Bhutan, Lao PDR and Sri Lanka |
|
|
13. DFID has cancelled nearly all of its aid debts
for low income countries by Retrospective Terms Adjustment (RTA), providing over
£1.3 billion of debt relief since 1978.
14. The annual sums reported as debt relief reflect the money available to the
country in the year in question that would otherwise have been spent on debt
servicing.2 This is, effectively, converting loans to grants.
15. In September 1997, the UK also launched the Commonwealth Debt Initiative
(CDI) to provide relief on the remaining aid debts (valued at £132m) of
lower-middle income Commonwealth countries. In order to benefit, countries were
required to demonstrate their commitment to poverty reduction and the Millennium
Development Goals, sound economic management, accountable and transparent
governance and efforts to reduce corruption. To date, 12 countries
(predominantly in the Caribbean) have benefited from debt relief under CDI.
Debts cancelled, or rescheduled, under CDI are reported in the same way as RTA.
16. DFID bilateral debt relief given under RTA and CDI in recent years is
included in Tables 1 (27 kb),
11 (30
kb),
12 and
21 (17 kb) under ‘DFID Debt Relief’. In 2005/06, £39.5m is shown as DFID debt relief3
2. These amounts of debt relief were ‘rolled up’ and reported to the DAC at
the time the change to lump sum reporting was made (1999).
3. Within this sum, annual cancellation under CDI will be included in the UK ODA
figures for 2005 or 2006 but the debts reported on the ‘benefit to country
basis’ will not be included in ODA figures as the relevant sums have already
been reported to the DAC. The sum also includes UK MDRI.
17. UK bilateral debt relief under the Heavily Indebted
Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative covers debt relief on bilateral export credit
and CDC loans to governments.
18. The Export Credit Guarantee Department (ECGD), like its counterparts in
other developed countries, assists UK exporters to win business overseas by
providing guarantees and insurance for contracts. Developing countries can
acquire debt, however, if they default on paying for these goods and services.
19. If countries face difficulties with meeting their debt repayments,
assistance may be provided in the form of rescheduling and, for poorer
countries, partial cancellation. Such arrangements are generally agreed in the
Paris Club and are conditional on the debtor country following sound economic
policies, agreed with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Bilateral export
credit debt is UK official debt, and so is eligible for debt relief under HIPC
and other internationally agreed debt relief deals.
20. The UK exceeds its commitment under HIPC by providing 100 per cent cancellation
of bilateral debts for qualifying countries. The Export Credit Guarantee
Department (ECGD) therefore offers 100 per cent debt service relief at Decision Point
and 100 per cent debt cancellation at Completion Point. ECGD meets the costs of the
relief agreed at the Paris Club and DFID pays for whatever additional relief is
needed to bring the total to 100 per cent. DFID payments to ECGD under this HIPC 100
per cent
relief policy are recorded as ‘Bilateral HIPC’. ‘Bilateral HIPC’ payments also
include reimbursements to countries under the ‘Hold in Trust’ Policy.4
21. In 2005/06 DFID ‘Bilateral HIPC’ payments amounted to £0.6m. In
Table 1 (27 kb), these payments are included within ‘Other Financial Aid’. They are
reported as ODA for the relevant year and identified as debt relief in DAC
reporting.
22. Table 22
(22 kb) contains details of debt relief given by ECGD. The total ECGD
debt relief for 2005/06 was £1.6 billion. ECGD and CDC debt relief are combined
in Table 2 (27 kb) under Debt Relief.
23. CDC (as described in the Glossary) had a portfolio of loans to
governments. These are now ‘DFID Public Sector Loans’ managed by Actis but
referred to as ‘CDC Loans’. This is UK official debt and so is eligible for debt
relief under HIPC and other internationally agreed debt deals. In 2005/06, £18.2m of CDC debts were cancelled as countries reached HIPC ‘Completion Point’
(see Tables 21 (17 kb) and
22 (22 kb)5
4. From December 2000, the UK has held in trust any debt service payments
received from pre-Decision Point HIPC countries. This money is then reimbursed
for spending on poverty reduction when the country reaches Decision Point.
5. ECGD/ CDC debt relief is reported as UK ODA in the relevant year on a net
basis (i.e. with deductions for any repayments made).
24. DFID also provides, through the HIPC Trust Fund at the World Bank,
financial support to help multilateral institutions provide debt relief under HIPC. DFID is currently the second largest bilateral contributor to the Trust
Fund. Contributions are recorded as ‘Multilateral HIPC Trust Fund’ in
Table 21 (17 kb)
and as a DFID multilateral contribution in Table 16. UK multilateral
contributions to the HIPC Trust Fund amounted to £11.1m in 2005/06. These
contributions are reported as ODA for the relevant year and identified as debt
relief in DAC reporting.
25. Despite the successes of HIPC, debt owed by the poorest countries to
multilateral institutions such as the World Bank, African Development Bank and
IMF remained a significant burden to them. The UK therefore used its
Presidencies of the G8 and EU in 2005 to promote 100 per cent debt relief by
multilateral institutions to match the 100 per cent relief already being given by
bilateral creditors.
26. In 2005, the G8 agreed a proposal for a Multilateral Debt Relief
Initiative (MDRI) that would cancel 100 per cent of the remaining debts of HIPCs to the
concessional lending arms of the World Bank (IDA), IMF and African Development
Bank (AfDB). This MDRI, worth over $50 billion to 43 countries, will mean 100
per cent
debt cancellation when countries reach HIPC ‘Completion Point’.
27. Donors agreed to fully compensate the Banks for the debt service that HIPC countries would otherwise have paid. These additional funds will be
allocated to all poor countries using the institutions' performance-based
allocation systems. MDRI relief will be delivered with no additional conditions,
although countries which have already passed HIPC Completion Point were required
to demonstrate that they had maintained their commitment to poverty reduction
and sound financial management.
28. The MDRI has now been agreed by the Boards of Governors of the IMF, World
Bank and AfDB and is being implemented at all three institutions. The IMF has
cancelled 100 per cent of the debts of 22 countries (16 of which are African). The
International Development Association (IDA), the concessional funding arm of the
World Bank has cancelled the debt of 20 countries, and the African Development
Fund (AfDF) of the African Development Bank has cancelled the debt of 16
countries. Twenty three other countries are eligible for similar cancellation when they
reach required standards. .
29. The UK will pay its share of the costs of the MDRI at the World Bank and
African Development Bank by additional contributions to IDA and AfDF from 2006/7
onwards. The costs of MDRI debt relief at the IMF were met from internal
resources. The G8 however, agreed to provide additional resources to the IMF to
ensure that it was able to continue to lend on concessional terms. In March
2006, the UK made a payment of £13.7m to the IMF as part of this. This
payment is included in the IMF payments in Table 16 (31 kb).
30. In addition to participation in the MDRI, the UK has also agreed to pay
its share (10 per cent) of qualifying non-HIPC poor countries’ debt service to IDA and
AfDB until 2015 under the UK Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative (UK MDRI). Six
non-HIPC countries (Armenia, Cape Verde, Georgia, Mongolia, Vietnam and Sri
Lanka) currently receive UK MDRI assistance. The UK also provided UK MDRI
assistance to 17 Completion Point HIPCs in 2005/06 until their debts were
cancelled under the new MDRI. In total, payments under UK MDRI during 2005/06
totalled £24.9m. These payments are included in DFID Debt Relief in Tables
12 and
21 (17 kb).
31. DFID co-funds (with
Austria, Canada, Ireland, Sweden and Switzerland) a programme of technical
advice and assistance for HIPC countries to strengthen their debt management
capacity. The programme, currently in its fourth and final phase, also assists
HIPCs to develop a debt management strategy to plan and manage future borrowing.
32. DFID also provides technical assistance in debt management for some non-HIPC
countries, supporting developing countries’ participation in Bank of England,
IMF and other training courses. Such assistance is included as ‘Technical
Cooperation’ in Table 1 (27 kb).
33. The UK, in line with other donors, reports cancellation of aid loans on a
lump sum basis to the OECD-DAC. This means that the total outstanding is
reported as ODA in the year in which a bilateral deal is signed between the UK
and a debtor country, except for countries reaching Completion Point under HIPC
where the date of the multilateral agreement is used as the date for DAC
reporting.
34. The various components of UK debt relief are summarised in
Table 21 (17 kb). In
2005/06, DFID debt relief of £64.9m represents, 1 per cent of the DFID programme
and UK debt relief of £1,653m represents 25 per cent of total GPEX. Debt relief
for Nigeria of £1,135m represents 69 per cent of UK debt relief and 17 per cent of total GPEX. Countries receiving DFID and non DFID debt relief are shown in
Tables 12
and 22 (22 kb) respectively.
35. Table 14 (50 kb) reports UK bilateral debt relief as reported to the DAC for 2004
as £415m. The sums reported to the DAC are lower than those shown in
Table 21 (17 kb) since a net figure is reported to the DAC (i.e. the difference between
loans repaid and debts forgiven in the year in question) whereas elsewhere we
show the total debt forgiven.6
6. Debt relief reported in SID under the heading ‘DFID debt relief’ (except the CDI
component) is not included in current ODA/ OA figures as the relevant sums have
already been reported. HIPC related payments and money for the CBP are included
in the total ODA figures (although CBP payments are not identified as debt
relief).
Back to top
|