The Governance and Transparency Fund Criteria and Guidelines(Valid as of
20 June 2007)
Related pages: Governance and Transparency Fund |
Frequently Asked Questions
| Terms of Reference
(38
kb) | Governance and Transparency – some thoughts
(37
kb)
“People want to be governed well, and to have a say in what happens in their
lives. They want to be safe. They want the chance to earn a decent living for
themselves and their families. And they want to be treated fairly by their
government and public officials. These aspirations are enshrined in the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the Millennium Declaration of 2000.
But the reality for people in poor countries is different… Effective states and
better governance are essential to combat poverty… Unless governance improves,
poor people will continue to suffer from a lack of security, public services and
economic opportunities”.
The ability of citizens to make their voices heard and hold their governments
to account is fundamental to good government. Its absence fosters an environment
in which corruption can flourish, and citizens are unable to assess the
decisions of their leaders, or make informed choices about who they elect to
serve as their representatives. Civil society, the media, and others have a key
role in promoting accountable governance and transparency.
To address some of these issues, DFID has created a new £100 million
Governance and Transparency Fund (GTF). It is designed to help citizens hold
their governments to account, through strengthening the wide range of groups
that can empower and support them.
Back to top
1. About the Fund
1.1 The key elements
- £100m over five years.
- A demand-led competitive Fund.
- Larger scale
proposals only – between £750,000 and £5m – based on a portfolio of activities
rather than individual projects.
- Projects within the portfolio must be based
in developing countries.
- One funding round.
- Up to 100% funding.
- Only one application per organisation or consortium
- Proposals to cover a period of up
to five years and not less than three years.
- Open to a wide range of not for
profit organisations, including those registered outside the UK.
- Successful applicants must grant 85% of GTF money to local partners in developing countries
– we will consider a lower figure if the applicant can show exceptional
circumstances.
- Proposals must address governance and transparency issues by
working through a variety of local partnerships and networks.
And in more detail…
1.2 Who can apply to the GTF?
The Fund is targeted principally at not for profit organisations. In order to
be eligible, organisations applying as lead or part of a consortium (see below)
must be formal legal entities, though need not be UK based. Examples include:
- NGOs;
- Faith based groups;
- Trade unions;
- Co-operatives;
- Media
groups;
- Women’s groups
- Other civil society groups, such as professional
bodies;
- Umbrella bodies that have a membership of a range of smaller civil
society or community based groups.
- Groups working on promoting democracy and
strengthening parliaments/parliamentary processes (but not political parties).
The fund will also consider proposals
which involve local/regional government bodies and certain for-profit
groups (particularly those involved in the media), where their involvement as
partners can be shown to be an integral part of the project/programme proposal.
1.3 Consortia
Consortia formed of one or more of the types of not-for-profit organisation
above are also encouraged to apply. Forging new links between organisations from
different traditions and backgrounds has the potential to play an important part
in a broader more inclusive approach to addressing governance and transparency
issues. Consortia applicants should set out the added value of the consortium
and the roles of each organisation within it.
1.4 Are Southern based not for profit organisations eligible?
Yes, providing they come within the definitions set out above and can submit
portfolio projects in the range £750,000 to £5m. However, the Fund will not
accept smaller proposals from Northern or Southern based organisations.
1.5 How will other Southern based organisations participate in the fund?
It’s vital that Southern based organisations can access this Fund because
they are the key players in addressing governance and transparency issues on the
ground.
All applications will therefore have to demonstrate that at least 85% of
money they receive under the Fund will be granted on to Southern based
organisations. Applicants will be required to provide details of all overheads
or administrative costs that form part of the programme budget. And in keeping
with normal practice, applicants are expected to ensure local partners have
sufficient technical and financial management capacity to undertake their
programme components.
We will only consider a proposal where the applicant intends to grant less
than 85% of the GTF monies to Southern partners if they can demonstrate unusual
circumstances and costs that arise as an integral part of delivering the
programme objectives.
1.6 Are there pre-determined allocations between sectors and activities or
geographical areas?
No. We expect many proposals to cover a portfolio of work in a range of
developing countries and continents and across a range of activities. It would
therefore be unhelpful to divide the Fund’s resources into rigid pre-determined
allocations. However, in assessing the overall package of proposals to be
supported under the Fund, we will aim for a reasonable balance across sectors
and geographical areas.
1.7 How are "developing countries" defined under the GTF?
Proposals can focus on work with partners in any Low or Middle Income Country
as defined by the DAC, excluding EU accession countries.
1.8 What is a portfolio?
A range of individual projects, with a number of partners, often delivered in
different locations, which taken overall represent a coherent strategic package
that will deliver agreed programme outcomes.
Back to top
1.10 Why larger scale portfolio proposals?
This is a practical way to bring together a wide range of existing skills and
experience to support the work of southern based organisations. Larger scale
portfolios based on clear overall programme outcomes underpinned by a range of
projects with a variety of southern partners will bring different perspectives,
encourage synergies between projects, and add to the diversity of partnerships.
1.11 Will the £100m be spent evenly over each of the five years?
No, our commitment is to spend £100m over five years through the Fund. The
precise year by year breakdown has yet to be determined. But in broad terms, the
first two years will probably have smaller allocations, and the later years
larger allocations in order to reflect the fact that actual spending on long
term programmes tends to start slowly and then accelerate.
1.12 Proposal to cover a period of up to five years?
The GTF commitment is £100m over five years. Addressing governance and
transparency issues involves this sort of longer term investment, so we expect
proposals to cover a period of up to five years, and not less than three.
1.13 One funding round?
Given the five year time frame and the size of proposals, there will be one
call for proposals rather than annual calls (see section on Process for more
details). Funding will, however, continue to be passed through to Southern
partners throughout the period of the scheme so there will be funding
opportunities for southern based organisations throughout. There will also be
scope for consortia to evolve and include new partners during the course of the
scheme.
1.14 Other DFID funding support
Applicants will not be excluded from the GTF on the grounds that they already
benefit from other grants from DFID – e.g. Partnership Programme Agreements (PPA),
Civil Society Challenge Fund (CSCF), Country Office support or humanitarian
relief/conflict resolution funding. Obviously, applicants cannot include in
their portfolio any projects that are already being funded under other DFID
schemes.
Back to top
2. The Proposals
2.1 Proposals need to demonstrate a strategy for addressing governance and
transparency underpinned by projects operated by a range of local partners which
have specific inputs and outcomes. The full range of all the local partnerships
and projects does not have to be included in the proposal; the lead organisation
will be able to allocate funding to partners throughout the five years. But it
will need to clearly set out initial partnerships and projects, together with
details of the process by which further partnerships will be developed and money
granted on to those local partners for specific projects.
2.2 All applications will need to demonstrate
in their proposals that they have considered:
- Gender - the needs of men and women within the activities and the overall
programme strategic outcomes.
- HIV/AIDS - the impact of this may have on the proposed activities.
- Environment - the environmental impact of the activities and the overall
programme strategy.
- Disability - whether disabled people will be included in
the activities and whether their rights and needs are considered within the
overall programme strategy.
2.3 Should proposals link to DFID'S objectives in specific countries?
This is not a mandatory requirement. The GTF is intended to be complementary
to DFID’s county programmes rather than an integral part of them. But DFID’s
Country Assistance Plans (CAPs) will provide a useful context for developing
applications, along with material from elsewhere. The new Country Governance
Analyses (CGAs) which DFID will be undertaking, as announced in the White Paper,
will be included in some of the CAPs. They will provide an assessment of the
trajectory of political governance and point to areas of governance and
transparency that may be in particular need of support or strengthening.
2.4 Where can I find CAPs and CGAs?
CAPs are public documents and are published on our website. Copies of CGAs,
in those countries where they have been undertaken, can be obtained from our
country offices.
2.5 What can’t be funded under the GTF?
- Disaster and humanitarian relief projects
- Research - though a small research component within a wider
action-orientated programme is allowable;
- Evangelising and proselytising
- Discrimination – any element of a project or portfolio that discriminates
between individuals or groups because of their race, ethnicity, gender, sexual
orientation, religion or disability
- Scholarships, unless as a small and
integral part of a broader project.
Back to top
3. Management and Process
3.1 DFID will contract out the management of the GTF to a Fund Manager. The
Fund Manager will be responsible for all aspects of operating the Fund from the initial
call for expressions of interest, through to paying grants, and appraising
reports and checking accounts. We aim to nominate and release details of the
Fund Manager by 25 April.
3.2 Will the Fund Manager’s fees and costs be met from the GTF?
No. The whole £100m GTF budget will only be used for grants to successful
applicants. The managing agent’s fees and costs will be met separately.
3.3 How will the application process work?
There will be two stages, Concept Notes and full proposal.
3.4 Submission of Concept Notes
There will be a widely published call for Concept Notes from the Fund Manager
with a clear timetable and contact details. Interested parties will be invited
to submit a three page (maximum) Concept Note setting out the basic concept of
the proposal and details about the applicant/s. The deadline for submitting
Concept Notes is midnight (GMT) Friday 29 June 2007.
3.5 This Concept Note stage will be used to make an initial assessment of
whether your ideas fit with the general purpose of the GTF and whether your
organisation/consortium meets eligibility criteria. At this stage, no judgement
will be made about relative strengths and weaknesses of the proposed work.
3.6 Concept Notes must be completed using guidance attached as Annex B (24
kb). Please follow all instructions on the template carefully.
3.7 And Next?
The Fund Manager will respond within a specified period. If the proposal outlined by the Concept Note is not eligible for the GTF, they will write to the applicant setting out the reasons. If it's accepted the applicant will be invited to submit a full proposal.
Back to top
3.8 The Full Proposal
This is the detailed document on which the strengths and weaknesses of the
programme will be assessed, and it will therefore be crucial in reaching a
decision on whether to offer support. Detailed guidance on the format of the
proposal will be made available through the Fund Manager. The key elements will be:
- The overall programme rationale and strategy;
- Programme approach – eg
outputs, range and types of partnerships and activities, how this links into the
overall rationale and strategy, and a risk analysis.
- Management and
implementation – details of Southern partners and partnerships to whom money
will be granted on; details of the initial projects to be undertaken by the
Southern partners; explanation of the process through existing partnerships will
be developed and new ones established and further projects identified.
- Budget.
- Monitoring arrangements with measurable outputs and indicators.
3.9 Appraising the Proposals
The Fund Manager will then conduct a detailed appraisal of the proposal.
This will include seeking comments from relevant DFID country offices and
others. If necessary the Fund Manager may also contact the applicant if issues
need further clarification. Key factors in the appraisal will include:
- Objectives. How do the programme’s objectives contribute to improving
governance and transparency?
- Outputs. What will the programme actually do? Are
the outputs meaningful and realistic?
- Partnerships. Who are the southern
parters, what is their legitimacy and potential, how has the partnership been
formed and developed?
- Capacity to deliver. Does the applicant have the
capacity to deliver against the objectives and outputs, what is its track record
and potential?
The Fund Manager will notify the applicant of the decision by a specified
date. If the proposal is unsuccessful, they will provide detailed feedback. If it’s
accepted they will follow up any points of detail that require fine tuning,
including the budget, and then issue a formal funding agreement. An example of
the funding agreements will be issued by the Fund Manager after Concept Notes
have been approved. They will also provide details of the payment system they will use
for grants made under the GTF.
3.10 And in summary?
A flow chart of the main stages is attached at
Annex A (22
kb)
3.11 How will the individual portfolios be monitored and reviewed?
Every year each successful applicant will be required to produce an annual
report on the progress of their portfolio. This will review progress against the
agreed output indicators. The Fund Manager will appraise these reports,
providing feedback to grant holders. The Fund Manager will discuss any areas
of concern, problematic issues, discuss any remedial action etc directly with
the portfolio holder.
Portfolio holders will also be required to submit a completion report at the
end of the programme and commission an external independent evaluation which
will assess the impact the portfolio.
3.12 Accounts
Successful applicants will be required to produce annual audited accounts of
the programme including details of all money that has been granted on to
Southern partners. They will also have to produce final audited accounts for the
whole programme. The Fund Manager will assess all of these accounts.
3.13 How will the Fund itself be monitored and reviewed?
The Fund Manager will produce an annual report on progress against
objectives by the Fund as a whole. A copy of the report will be placed on the
DFID website and made widely available to the sector.
3.14 How will good practice and innovative
approaches be shared?
All annual reports will be posted on a programme website and lesson learning
workshops will be held regularly. The Fund Manager's annual report to DFID
will also be posted on the DFID website and shared widely amongst the sector.
3.15 Will the overall GTF be assessed?
Yes. A mid-term and final independent evaluation will be commissioned to
assess the overall impact of the Fund and its contribution to DFID’s objectives.
Back to top
|